Bush lawyers involved in discussing fate of CIA videotapes

This is off The New York Times:

WASHINGTON — At least four top White House lawyers took part in discussions with the Central Intelligence Agency between 2003 and 2005 about whether to destroy videotapes showing the secret interrogations of two operatives from Al Qaeda, according to current and former administration and intelligence officials.

The accounts indicate that the involvement of White House officials in the discussions before the destruction of the tapes in November 2005 was more extensive than Bush administration officials have acknowledged.

Those who took part, the officials said, included Alberto R. Gonzales, who served as White House counsel until early 2005; David S. Addington, who was the counsel to Vice President Dick Cheney and is now his chief of staff; John B. Bellinger III, who until January 2005 was the senior lawyer at the National Security Council; and Harriet E. Miers, who succeeded Mr. Gonzales as White House counsel.

It was previously reported that some administration officials had advised against destroying the tapes, but the emerging picture of White House involvement is more complex. In interviews, several administration and intelligence officials provided conflicting accounts as to whether anyone at the White House expressed support for the idea that the tapes should be destroyed.

This story is huge. We have four Bush administration lawyers who knew of these CIA interrogation videotapes--Alberto Gonzales, David Addington, John Bellinger, and Harriet Miers. All four of these top Bush officials took part in discussing whether these tapes should be destroyed, or not. More importantly, these discussions took place before the tapes were destroyed. This is a cover-up. The Bush administration did not want these tapes revealed to the public, since these could have shown torture techniques the CIA was engaged in--such as waterboarding. Continuing with the NY Times article:

One former senior intelligence official with direct knowledge of the matter said there had been “vigorous sentiment” among some top White House officials to destroy the tapes. The former official did not specify which White House officials took this position, but he said that some believed in 2005 that any disclosure of the tapes could have been particularly damaging after revelations a year earlier of abuses at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.

Some other officials assert that no one at the White House advocated destroying the tapes. Those officials acknowledged, however, that no White House lawyer gave a direct order to preserve the tapes or advised that destroying them would be illegal.

The big question here is who had the "vigorous sentiment" to destroy the tapes--Addington? Bellinger? I suspect the "vigorous sentiment" for destroying the tapes came from Vice President Cheney's office, simply for the sake of keeping these interrogations secret. Of course, we won't know since the tapes are destroyed. There is still so much more here regarding this scandal.